Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 N.C. 371 - State v. Hunter

State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably State v. Norman (1989), 80 N.C. App. 190 - State v. Hunt (1986)

2 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

1801986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Davis · State v. Kirby · State v. Hewett · State v. Anderson · State v. Clay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “require[ ] the court to take into consideration the resources of the defendant, [his] ability to earn, [his] obligation to support dependents, and such other matters as shall pertain to [his] ability to make restitution or reparation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Provided further, that no third party shall benefit by way of restitution or reparation as a result of the liability of that third party to pay indemnity to an aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by the defendant, but the liability of a third party to pay indemnity to an aggrieved party or any payment of indemnity actually made by a third party to an aggrieved party does not prohibit or limit in any way the power of the court to require the defendant to make complete or full restitution or reparation to the aggrieved party for the total amount of the damage or loss caused by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] defendant is given the election between imprisonment and probation in the first instance; and once he chooses probation, the statute guarantees full due process before there can be a revocation of probation ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.