State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2016
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Franks v. Delaware · Chambers v. Maroney · Bullock v. United States · Massachusetts v. Upton · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]or a violation [of section 15A-511 ] to be substantial, [a] defendant must show that the delay in some way prejudiced him, for example, by causing a violation of his constitutional rights, ... or by resulting in a confession that would not have been obtained but for the delay [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a juror may not impeach the verdict of the jury after it has been rendered and received in open court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Burr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.