Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 NW2D 427 - State v. Blanchard

State v. Blanchard’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
10
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably State v. Johnston (1988), State v. Ture (1984)

39 state decisions — followed in 10 states

2601982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Frye v. United States · 70 Cal. 2d 522 - People v. Ireland · State v. Hurd · United States v. Brown · State v. Mena

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the risk that the jury will consider the victim’s statements of fear as a true indication of a defendant’s intentions or actions,” Campbell v. United States, 391 A.2d 283, 287 (D.C.App.1978).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A statement of the declarant's then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the execution, revocation, identification, or terms of declarant's will.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A defendant claiming error in the trial court’s reception of evidence has the burden of showing both the error and the prejudice resulting from the error. * * * A reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury to convict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.