Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 P2D 957 - Hurt v. Hurt

Hurt v. Hurt’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1993

6 state decisions

3019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Weatherspoon v. Weatherspoon · Phillips v. Phillips · Dodson v. Dodson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is generally recognized that the mother is a natural custodian of her child of tender years, and that if she is a fit and proper person other things being equal, she should be given custody in order that the child may receive the attention, care, supervision, and kindly advice, which arises from a mother’s love and devotion, for which no substitute has ever been found." (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.