People v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Davis v. Washington · Purkett v. Elem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the only question remaining for the purposes of our state Confrontation Clause analysis is whether the statement is reliable, a question which is answered through the analysis of admissibility under our state rules of evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Valles“We review de novo a defendant's contention that the trial court violated his or her Confrontation Clause rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Valles“even if that ground was not articulated or considered by the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. People v. Marciano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.