Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

315 S.C. 471

State v. Tennyson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 13, 1994

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1994-06-13

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2012

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Breech

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-06-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam:

¶1Appellant pled guilty to fourth offense driving under the influence (DUI). He argues on appeal that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to accept his plea since his prior DUI convictions were from another state. We disagree.

¶2In State v. Breech, 308 S.C. 356, 417 S.E. (2d) 873 (1992), this Court held that S.C. Code Ann. § 56-5-2940 did not authorize enhanced penalties for out-of-state DUI convictions. However, the Legislature subsequently amended § 56-5-2940 to provide for enhanced penalties when the prior convictions were from another state. Act No. 453, § 14, 1992 S.C. Acts 2402. This amendment became effective on June 30, 1992.

¶3By virtue of the statutory amendment, the State is now *472permitted to include out-of-state convictions in determining whether a DUI committed on or after June 30, 1992 is a second or subsequent offense. In the case at hand, the DUI to which appellant pled guilty occurred on December 31, 1992. Accordingly, the 1992 amendments to § 56-5-2940 authorize the classification of the DUI as a fourth offense despite the fact that appellant’s prior convictions were from another state and the circuit court had jurisdiction to accept the guilty plea to fourth offense DUI.

¶4Affirmed.

Harwell, C.J., not participating.
/315/sc/471 · .json · Public domain