315 SO2D 875 - Borck v. Stockstill

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 2019

4 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

BLANCHE, Judge.

¶1For the reasons set forth in our opinion in “Mrs. Mary Borck, widow of Thomas C. Patin, et al. v. Huey Stockstill, et al.,” being No. 10,266, La.App., 315 So.2d 868 the granting of the peremptory exception of prescription in Suit No. 42,639 (appellate No. 10,267), in favor of the defendants Huey Stockstill, Huey Stockstill, Inc., and W. J. Thibodeaux, Jr., against the plaintiffs therein, Mrs. Mary Borck, widow of Thomas C. Patin, et al., dismissing the plaintiffs’ entire suit is hereby reversed.

¶2However, that portion of the judgment in this suit which sustained the defendants’ peremptory exception of prescription regarding the trespass and damages occurring to the plaintiffs on November 25, 1971, is hereby affirmed.

¶3All costs of this appeal are to be paid by defendants.

¶4Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.