Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 U.S. 44 - United States v. Joliet & Chicago Railroad

United States v. Joliet & Chicago Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

315 U.S. 44 · 1942

Citation profile

260
cited by 260 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

136 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 260 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2008 · most notably Commissioner v. Tower (1946), National Carbide Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1949)

136 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

10901942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedJoliet & C. R. Co. v. United States (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Helvering v. Clifford · Lucas v. Earl · Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner · Oklahoma v. Texas · Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 260 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Respondent [Joliet] urges, and the court below held, that this so-called lease in perpetuity without a defeasance clause divested respondent of all right, title and interest in the property and vested a full and indefeasible title in the grantee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[f]or the rental or purchase payments for the property.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Payments made directly to shareholders by the lessee or transferee of corporate property are properly recognized as income to the corporation by reason of the relationship of a corporation to its shareholders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.