Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 315 U.S. 60 - Glasser v. United States

Glasser v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

315 U.S. 60 · 1942

Citation profile

26,381
cited by 26,381 later decisions
247
cited 247 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

17,141 federal appellate · 386 district · 3,322 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26,381 later decisions (247 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Strickland v. Washington (1984), Jackson v. Virginia (1979)

17,141 federal appellate · 386 district · 3,322 state decisions — followed in 50 states

7.3k0194219501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Glasser (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 411

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Cited together with Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Kotteakos v. United States · Pereira v. United States · Holland v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26,381 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it.”
    594 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “development and collocation of circumstances.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a way of consummating the conspiracy ... which, like the use of a gun to effect a conspiracy to murder, is purely ancillary to the substantive offense”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How later courts have treated this case

Across 102 classified citations — whether each later court relied on, limited, or rejected this decision:

  • 86followed
  • 12cited without characterization
  • 4explained

Treatment is classified from each citing court's own sentence. This is a running sample — coverage grows as the classification pass proceeds; overrulings are also tracked authoritatively in the case status.