McCord v. Papantoniou’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 1107 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg · Celotex Corporation v. Edwards · Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca · Pacor Inc. v. Higgins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the right to a jury trial applies in a proceeding that may be heard under this section by a bankruptcy judge, the bankruptcy judge may conduct the jury trial if specially designated to exercise such jurisdiction by the district court and with the express consent of all the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In RE McCLELLAND“apply the same analysis ... to adversary proceedings related to Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.