Celebrezze v. Bolas’s Empirical Analysis
316 F.2d 498 · 1963
Citation profile
105 federal appellate · 27 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 263 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably Brinker v. Weinberger (1975), Dvorak v. Celebrezze (1965)
105 federal appellate · 27 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Kerner v. Flemming
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 263 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion and it must be based on the record as a whole.”
20 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ * * * The resolution of this conflict is what the trier of fact is for. Had this case been one tried to a jury it is obvious to us that Bolas would not have been entitled to a directed verdict and that the jury’s verdict either way would have been conclusive. Consequently, the Secretary’s decision here, if it be wrong, is an error of fact and is not subject to correction by a reviewing court. * * * ” 316 F.2d at 506 12”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.