Barton v. Borit’s Empirical Analysis
316 F.2d 550 · 1963
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2011
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Simpson v. Shepard · Standard Oil Co. v. Southern Pacific Co. · Brooks-Scanlon Corporation v. United States · United States v. Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Navigation Co. · The Baltimore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * such as is established by contemporaneous sales of like property in the way of ordinary business, as in the case of merchandise bought and sold in the market, * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. 125 F. Supp. 2d 981 - In Re American Milling Co. · Oliver J. Olson & Co., a Corporation, Libelant v. The American Steamship Marine Leopard, Etc., and Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., a Corporation, Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., a Corporation, Libelant v. Oliver J. Olson & Co., a Corporation, Petition of Oliver J. Olson & Co., a Corporation, for Exoneration From, or Limitation Of, Liability, as Owner and Operator of the Steamship Howard Olson“Only if it should appear that there was no market [for vessels similar to the Edgar M. Queeny] or there were so few sales of like (ships) that it could not be predicted with any assurance that the prices paid would be repeated in a postulated sale of the (ship) in question, may resort be had to other relevant indicia of value such as replacement cost appropriately deducted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the sum which, considering all the circumstances, probably could have been obtained for her on the date of the collision; that is, the sum that in all probability would result from fair negotiations between an owner willing to sell and a purchaser willing to buy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.