Sevencan v. Herbert’s Empirical Analysis
316 F.3d 76 · 2002
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Coleman v. Thompson · Johnson v. United States · In re Oliver · Waller v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), holding that the heightened showing requirement of Yung I is satisfied "where the record reflects that the state trial court considered the familial relationship at the time the family member was excluded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an additional burden on the prosecution whenever a family member is excluded”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.