Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 F.3d 93 - Davis v. New York

Davis v. New York’s Empirical Analysis

316 F.3d 93 · 2002

Citation profile

249
cited by 249 later decisions
May 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 249 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Richardson v. Goord (2003), Johnson v. Killian (2012)

21 federal appellate · 4 district ·

1610200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Farmer v. Brennan · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Kentucky v. Graham · Hafer v. Melo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 249 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “do more than simply show that there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts ... the nonmoving party must come forward with 'specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “conclusory statements or mere allegations [are] not sufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Under Article III, section 2 of the Constitution, federal courts lack jurisdiction to decide questions that cannot affect the rights of litigants in the case before them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.