United States v. Prisel’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2020
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1462 · 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553
Relies on United States v. Booker · Gall v. United States · Rita v. United States · Sells v. United States · Baker v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Mood shall participate in a program approved by the United States Probation Department for mental health, including but not limited to, sex offender treatment. This may be satisfied by continued treatment by Dr. Dennis P. Sugrue. 2. Mood shall comply with all applicable requirements to register as a sex offender, and adhere to any state, local or federal law for sex offenders. 3. Mood shall not obtain a residence without prior approval from the Probation Officer. 4. Mood shall not be involved in any internet activity unless approved by the Probation Department. 5. Mood shall allow the Probation Department or a computer expert as approved by the Probation Department, to review all available programs, hardware, software and email addresses associated with his computer use. 6. Mood shall not visit any location that would allow him to access the internet without permission of the Probation Officer. 7. Mood shall allow the Probation Department to place any filter, or monitoring device on any computer system. 8. Mood shall not purchase, sell, view or possess any form of pornography, sexually explicit or sexually orientated materials, including visual, auditory, telephonic, or electronic media, computer programs or services. Mood shall not patronize any place where such material or entertainment is available and shall not utilize or possess any sex-related telephone numbers. 9. Mood shall not frequent places where minors congregate or gather. 10. Mood shall not seek, obtain, or m”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) The nature and circumstances of the offense, and history and characteristics of defendant. (2) The need for the sentence imposed— (A) to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to promote respect for the law, and to provide just punishment for the offense; (B) to afford adequate deterrence to criminal conduct; (C) to protect the public from further crimes of the defendant; and (D) to provide the defendant with needed educational or vocational training, medical care, or other correctional treatment in the most effective manner. (3) The kind of sentences available. (4) The kinds of sentence and the sentencing range established for— (A) the applicable category of offense committed by the applicable category of defendant as set forth in the guidelines. (5) Any pertinent policy statements [issued by the Sentencing Commission.] (6) The need to avoid unwarranted sentence disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct. (7) The need to provide restitution to any victims of the offense. Particularly as to the § 3553(a) factors: 1. The nature and the circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant: This factor has been adequately described in Defendant’s Sentencing Memorandum (Doe. No. 28) as follows: 7 Mr. Mood is 73 years old, and but for this case has never been in trouble with the law. As demonstrated by his history and the letters submitted to the Court, Mr. Mood has lived a productive, law-abidi”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.