Yang v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · 305 Ga. App. 391 - Hankla v. Jackson · 134 Ga. App. 530 - Kamensky v. Stacey · 290 Ga. App. 892 - Hawkins v. Ob-Gyn Associates, P.A. · 283 Ga. App. 887 - Almond v. McCranie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The issue of the admissibility or exclusion of expert testimony rests in the broad discretion of the trial court, and consequently, the trial court's ruling thereon cannot be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. Further, we review a trial court's ruling on a motion in limine for abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.