Brock Built, LLC v. Blake’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 300 Ga. App. 816 - Brock Built, LLC v. Blake · 291 Ga. App. 883 - City of Atlanta v. Hofrichter/Stiakakis · 307 Ga. App. 330 - McReynolds v. Krebs · 268 Ga. App. 579 - Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Tvrdeich · 277 Ga. App. 749 - Bourke v. Webb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court may consider a contingent fee agreement and the amount it would have generated as evidence of usual and customary fees in determining both the reasonableness and the amount of an award of attorney fees. When a party seeks fees based on a contingent fee agreement, [however,] the party must show that the contingency fee percentage was a usual or customary fee for such case and that the contingency fee was a valid indicator of the value of the professional services rendered. In addition, the party seeking fees must also introduce evidence of hours, rates, or some other indication of the value of the professional services actually rendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.