Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 Ill. App. 3d 1252 - Ashley v. Snyder

316 Ill. App. 3d 1252 - Ashley v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 326 Ill. App. 3d 414 - People v. Calvert (2001), 318 Ill. App. 3d 939 - McNeil v. Carter (2001)

3 federal appellate · 37 state decisions

290200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 45 (§ 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914)

Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Bell v. Wolfish · Hudson v. Palmer · Sandin v. Conner · Hewitt v. Helms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The Constitution does not require that prisons be comfortable [citation], only that they supply basic human needs [citation]. Inmates thus have a constitutional right to adequate shelter, food, drinking water, clothing, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety. [Citations.] Prisoners also have a reasonable right of access to courts and a right to a reasonable opportunity to exercise religious freedom under the first amendment. [Citation.] Beyond these, prisoners possess no other rights, only privileges." Ashley, 316 Ill.App.3d at 1258-59 , 250 Ill.Dec. 900 , 739 N.E.2d at 903 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[P]rison officials may—as a condition of confinement—establish rules and regulations that limit the type and quantity of personal property that an inmate may keep in his prison cell, and such rules and regulations do not infringe upon the inmate's constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[searching] through prison regulations and state statutes in search of mandatory language on which to base their purported `rights'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.