316 Ill. App. 3d 949 - Bailey v. Allstate Development Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably 368 Ill. App. 3d 492 - Brandon v. Bonell (2006), 323 Ill. App. 3d 1028 - Casualty Insurance v. Hill Mechanical Group (2001)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 138 Ill. 2d 178 - Kraft, Inc. v. Edgar · 181 Ill. 2d 460 - Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. Gleason · 73 Ill. 2d 113 - Towns v. Yellow Cab Co. · 171 Ill. 2d 378 - Barnett v. Zion Park District · 179 Ill. 2d 173 - Paris v. Feder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`It is clear * * * that the immunities granted by the present statute are limited to those persons who have engaged in the design, planning, supervision, observation or management of construction[,] or construction of the improvement[,] and all other persons, owners, tenants, persons in possession or control[,] and suppliers of material are still excluded from the benefits of the statute although they may be exposed to liability by reason of construction defects.'"”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"An interlocutory order may be modified or revised by a successor court at any time prior to final judgment. [Citations.] However, in circumstances where the interlocutory order involved the exercise of a prior judge's discretion, the successor judge may overturn the order only where new facts or circumstance warrant such action and there is no evidence of 'judge shopping.' [Citation.] A noteworthy exception to this rule exists where the successor judge finds that the previous interlocutory order is erroneous as a matter of law. In such a case, the successor judge has the power to correct the previous order regardless of the existence of new matter." Bailey v. Allstate Development Corp. , 316 Ill. App. 3d 949 , 956-57, 250 Ill.Dec. 225 , 738 N.E.2d 189 (2000).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“ordinarily, once a judge has made a discretionary ruling, the ruling will not be disturbed by a judge of coordinate jurisdiction unless there is a change of circumstances or additional facts that warrant such action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.