Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 MASS 24 - Commonwealth v. Torrealba

Commonwealth v. Torrealba’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
8
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Commonwealth v. Fancy (1965), Commonwealth v. Sandler (1975)

36 state decisions

11019441950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. O'Brien · Commonwealth v. Best · Blair's Foodland Inc. v. Shuman's Foodland, Inc. · Commonwealth v. McDermott · Meehan v. North Adams Savings Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Certain exceptions to the admission of evidence remain to be considered. The manager of the Enterprise store was permitted to testify that it was the custom in his store to give a sales slip with each purchase. In this there was no error. (Citing cases.) “The manager of each of the four stores testified that he had examined the record of the cash register on the afternoon in question, and that this did not show the sale of any article alleged in the indictment to have been the property of his store. This was a proper method of proving the absence of any record of sale. Commonwealth v. Best, 180 Mass. 492, 495 , 62 N.E. 748 ; Blair’s Foodland, Inc., v. Shuman’s Foodland, Inc., 311 Mass. 172, 176 , 40 N.E.2d 303 ; Wigmore on Evidence, 3d Ed., § 1244. In these circumstances the proof of the fact that an entry does not exist does not require the production of the records themselves or the laying of a foundation for the introduction of secondary evidence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.