Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 Md. 248 - State v. Jett

State v. Jett’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably 140 Md. App. 282 - Baltimore Police Department v. Cherkes (2001), Montgomery County v. Stevens (1995)

34 state decisions

2601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mitchell v. Forsyth · Abney v. United States · Nixon v. Fitzgerald · Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Weintraub · Kahn v. Grant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘[T]he order must [ (1) ] conclusively determine the disputed question, [ (2) ] resolve an important issue [, (3) be] completely separate from the merits of the action, and [ (4) ] be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.’ ””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““No longer does the concept of sovereign immunity embody a strong element of freedom from suit because the Act contains a broad consent to suit. No longer is there heavy emphasis on protecting state officials and employees from disruption in the performance of their duties by defending against tort claims. Rather, under the Act, emphasis shifts to protection of the public treasury by limiting the financial exposure. This is accomplished through a number of techniques including limiting the State’s waiver to the extent of insurance coverage procured----””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““We analogized the rejection of the sovereign immunity defense to the rejection of public official immunity defenses where the United States Supreme Court has applied the collateral order doctrine. See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985) (denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent it turns on an issue of law); Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 102 S.Ct. 2690 , 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982) (absolute privilege).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.