Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 N.C. 141 - State v. Wrenn

State v. Wrenn’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably State v. Fletcher (1998), 124 N.C. App. 35 - Moore v. Evans (1996)

30 state decisions

1201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York v. Belton · Alford v. United States · State v. Odom · Washington Post Co. v. Rebozo · State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when there is 'a reasonable ground of suspicion, supported by circumstances sufficiently strong in themselves to warrant a cautious man in believing the accused to be guilty.' (Citations omitted.) The existence of probable cause depends upon 'whether at that moment the facts and circumstances within [the officer's] knowledge and of which [he] had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the [suspect] had committed or was committing an offense.' (Citation omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The fact that the defendant’s probation was not revoked based on subsequent allegation that the defendant had called and threatened the victim is not sufficient, standing alone, to prove that the victim’s accusation was false. There could be, and often are, other reasons why a judge does not revoke one’s probation in a given case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] violation of the defendant's rights under the Constitution of the United States is prejudicial unless the appellate court finds that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.