Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 N.C. 594 - State v. Richardson

State v. Richardson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
7
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably State v. Wallace (2000), State v. Smith (1991)

53 state decisions

2401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Simuel v. United States · State v. Gardner · State v. Rook · State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the specifics of the charges against him, the range of punishment, and the effect of his cooperation. He was informed that the officers had no authority to make any arrangements concerning the charges against him and that Tennessee authorities had no control over what other states might do concerning crimes within their jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Promises or statements indicating to an accused that he will receive some benefit if he confesses do not render his confession involuntary when made in response to a solicitation by the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Defendant has not shown that he has been prejudiced by the fact that the trial court's conclusions of law were incorrectly denominated as findings of fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.