Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 N.W.2d 335 - State v. Bryan

State v. Bryan’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2021

11 state decisions

3019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex parte Lange · United States v. Benz · United States v. Ford · Sullens v. United States · Oxman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Under Rule 35 a sentencing court may only correct an illegal sentence, correct a sentence imposed in an illegal manner, or reduce a sentence. Bryan's original sentence was not illegal or imposed in an illegal manner. The second sentence did not reduce the original sentence; it increased the punishment. Therefore, the trial judge's attempt to change Bryan's original sentence violates the provisions of Rule 35. As we said in State v. Rueb, 249 N.W.2d 506, 511 (N.D. 1976): ` The change or modification of a sentence is permitted in North Dakota now, but only pursuant to Rule 35, NDRCrimP. `" State v. Bryan, 316 N.W.2d 335, 337-338 (N.D.1982). [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A person convicted of a felony who is sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year shall be deemed to have been convicted of a misdemeanor upon successful completion of the term of imprisonment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.