State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2007 · most notably State v. Moeller (1996), State v. Holland (1984)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Maestas · United States v. Buckhanon · United States v. Baldarrama · United States v. Gocke · United States v. Weaver
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any fact that tends to connect an accused with the commission of a crime is relevant and has probative value.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moeller · State v. Lowther“Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dokken · State v. Krebs“Two of the principal factors bearing upon the admissibility of evidence of other crimes are a sequential relationship between the offenses and the modis operan-di employed. Where the incidents are close in time and similar in modis operands evidence of other crimes is frequently admissible on, among other things, the question of defendant’s identity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Krebs · State v. Kerkhove
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.