People v. Torrez’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited
1 district · 10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Martin v. People · People v. Fuller · People v. Watkins · People v. Vigil · People v. Melillo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the charges result from the same act, so that the evidence of the act is identical, or from two or more acts fairly considered to be separate acts, so that the evidence is different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Fritts“[a] sentencing court is mandated to impose concurrent sentences only when the evidence will support no other reasonable inference than that the convictions were based on identical evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Fritts“Courts should not presume that the legislature used language 'idly and with no intent that meaning should be given to its language”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Stroud
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.