316 So. 2d 304 - Danforth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
January 1990
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 316 So. 2d 267 - Williams v. State · 316 So. 2d 277 - State v. Lyles · 316 So. 2d 279 - Hall v. State · 308 So. 2d 586 - Mower v. State · 316 So. 2d 276 - Estes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Since the time awaiting an escape trial is a mandatory continuation of the defendant’s original sentence as a matter of law, F.S. § 921.161 (1) is not applicable. Most assuredly, appellants automatically received credit on the original sentences for time served awaiting disposition of the escape charge, therefore, the trial court was correct in refusing to give them credit for time served as applied to the sentence imposed on the escape charge itself.” Id. at 306.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.