Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 So. 2d 372 - State v. Sneed

316 So. 2d 372 - State v. Sneed’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew (1978), 450 So. 2d 621 - State v. Jackson (1984)

55 state decisions

29019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · State v. Lacoste · State v. Richey · State v. Kreller · State v. Ducre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the state intends to introduce a confession or inculpatory statement in evidence, it shall so advise the defendant in writing prior to beginning the state's opening statement. If it fails to do so a confession or inculpatory statement shall not be admissible in evidence.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The opening statement of the state shall explain the nature of the charge, and set forth, in general terms, the nature of the evidence by which the state expects to prove the charge. Source: New; cf. former R.S. 15:333."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The purpose is not simply to give the defendant notice of a confession or inculpatory statements, but also of the state's intent to use it at the trial.... The defendant's trial strategy (such as a decision to testify or not) and the preparation of his defense (such as securing witnesses to attempt to prove involuntariness or to explain an involuntary statement) are affected by the state's notice (or not) of its intent to use a given confession or statement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.