316 So. 2d 418 - Case v. Case’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Howard v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Insurance · 223 So. 2d 483 - Cobb v. Bergeron · 297 So. 2d 463 - Huff v. Caldwell · 245 So. 2d 517 - Martin v. Garlotte · Imhoff v. Imhoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Does the deposit of cash pursuant to a devolutive appeal as security for the payment of costs including the preparation of the transcript, relieve the appellant of the necessity of making an additional payment of costs or can that deposit be used for the payment of the costs it is designed to secure ? (2) Did appellant, in fact, timely mail a check for costs to the clerk and, if so, does that mean the failure of the clerk to lodge the transcript timely is not imputable to the fault of the appellant?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Case v. Case“The security furnished to perfect a devolutive or suspensive appeal should remain intact until the final determination of the litigation for the protection of all persons in interest. There is no statutory authority for the clerk of court to make payments from or apply the proceeds of cash deposited as security in connection with an appeal prior to the conclusion of the litigation. [Emphasis added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boes v. Boes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.