Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 So. 2d 727 - State v. Lepkowski

316 So. 2d 727 - State v. Lepkowski’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2000

21 state decisions

1301975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 304 So. 2d 300 - State v. Kaufman · State v. Curry · 283 So. 2d 756 - State v. Newman · State v. Sercovich · State v. Callihan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Another crime committed or alleged to have been committed by the defendant as to which evidence is not admissible.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a colloquial term for heroin, was an improper reference to another crime committed by defendant. This motion was refused. La.Code of Criminal Procedure article 770 makes a mistrial mandatory when the judge, district attorney or a court official refers to another crime committed by defendant as to which evidence is not admissible. In this case the contested remark was made by a witness, and there is no indication that the State intended to elicit his reference to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.