Mahaffey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 18 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler))
Relationships
Relies on Lamie v. United States Trustee · Boykin v. State · United States Totten v. Bombardier Corporation · Tarrant Appraisal District v. Moore · State v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The word ‘turn’ is not a legal term of art — it has no ‘acquired technical meaning.’ ‘Turn’ has many dictionary meanings, but in the context of driving, ‘turn’ means to change directions — to turn the vehicle from a direct course of the roadway. You either turn left, or you turn right out of the direct course or flow of normal traffic.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crider v. State“No person shall turn a vehicle onto a highway or move a vehicle right or left upon a highway or merge onto or exit from a highway unless and until the movement can be made with reasonable safety nor without giving an appropriate signal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mahaffey v. State“Statutory construction is a question of law; therefore our review is de novo.” Mahaffey v. State, 316 S.W.3d 633, 637 (Tex.Crim.App.2010). . The Third Court stated;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leming v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.