Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 U.S. 101 - Waley v. Johnston

Waley v. Johnston’s Empirical Analysis

316 U.S. 101 · 1942

Citation profile

1,028
cited by 1,028 later decisions
121
cited 121 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

457 federal appellate · 54 district · 217 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,028 later decisions (121 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably Boykin v. Alabama (1969), Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

457 federal appellate · 54 district · 217 state decisions — followed in 34 states

3050194219501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedWaley v. Johnston (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Mooney v. Holohan · Bram v. United States · Chambers v. Florida · Walker v. Johnston

Cited together with Walker v. Johnston · Johnson v. Zerbst · MacHibroda v. United States · Kercheval v. United States · Townsend v. Sain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,028 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “extends also to those exceptional cases where the conviction has been in disregard of the constitutional rights of the accused, and where the writ is the only effective means of preserving his rights.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The facts relied on are dehors the record and their effect on the judgment was not open to consideration and review on appeal. In such circumstances the use of the writ in the federal courts to test the constitutional validity of a conviction for crime ... extends ... to those exceptional cases where the conviction has been in disregard of the constitutional rights of the accused, and where the writ is the only effective means of preserving his rights.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““For a conviction on a plea of guilty coerced by a federal law enforcement officer is no more consistent with due process than a conviction supported by a coerced confession.” 62 S.Ct. at 966 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.