Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 316 U.S. 535 - Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Williamson

Skinner v. State of Oklahoma Williamson’s Empirical Analysis

316 U.S. 535 · 1942

Citation profile

3,425
cited by 3,425 later decisions
222
cited 222 times by the Supreme Court
48
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

625 federal appellate · 261 district · 1,540 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3,425 later decisions (222 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Baker v. Carr (1962), Roe v. Wade (1973)

625 federal appellate · 261 district · 1,540 state decisions — followed in 48 states

1.1k0194219501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · United States v. Carolene Products Co. · Cannon v. United States · William Truax v. Mike Raich

Cited together with Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Meyer v. State of Nebraska · Loving v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Roe v. Wade · Eisenstadt v. Baird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3,425 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Marriage and procreation are fundamental to the very existence and survival of the race.”
    62 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`lays an unequal hand on those who have committed intrinsically the same quality of offense'”
    21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““[A] State is not constrained in the exercise of its police power to ignore experience which marks a class of offenders or a family of offenses for special treatment. Nor is it prevented by the equal protection clause from confining ‘its restrictions to those classes of cases where the need is deemed to be clearest. * * * the law does all that is needed when it does all that it can, indicates a policy, applies it to all within the lines, and seeks to bring within the lines all similarly situated so far and so fast as its means allow.’ ” 316 U.S. at 540 , 62 S.Ct. at 1113 .”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.