State v. Sklar’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2025
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Baldwin v. New York · Ex parte Grossman · Schick v. United States · State v. Munsey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have a right ... To have a speedy, public and impartial trial, and, except in trials by martial law or impeachment, by a jury of the vicinity.” Me. Const, art. 1, § 6. A criminal defendant in Maine state court in 1995 and 1996 was entitled to a jury trial even for offenses that could be characterized as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.