Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 Ark. 289 - Bell v. State

Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Bell v. State (1996), Davis v. State (1995)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

180199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Vickers v. State · Hogan v. State · Beck v. State · Tucker v. State · Ashing v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The seriousness of the offense, and whether violence was employed by the juvenile in the commission of the offense; (2) Whether the offense is part of a repetitive pattern of adjudicated offenses which would lead to the determination that the juvenile is beyond rehabilitation under existing rehabilitation programs, as evidenced by past efforts to treat and rehabilitate the juvenile and the response to such efforts; and (3) The prior history, character traits, mental maturity, and any other factor which reflects upon the juvenile’s prospects for rehabilitation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An accomplice, even of minor age, is responsible for the activities of his cohort.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We note that even though the trial judge was not required to make specific findings of fact when reaching his decision, to have done so would have been most helpful to this court in determining whether or not his decision was clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.