Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 BR 446 - In Re Upshur

In Re Upshur’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 323 · 11 U.S.C. § 350 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on Burnes III v. Pemco Aeroplex Inc · Rosinski v. Boyd · Barger v. City of Cartersville · Parker v. Wendy's International, Inc. · Judd v. Wolfe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The only way the proper party can be brought into the action is to reopen the bankruptcy case to see if the trustee wishes to intervene. If the case is reopened and the trustee intervenes, then under [ Parker ], judicial estoppel will generally not apply. The exception might be if the trustee recovered more than the amount necessary to satisfy all creditors. In that event, the defendants could invoke judicial estoppel to try to limit any monetary recovery to the amount needed to satisfy creditors and the trustee's expenses."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Property that is not correctly scheduled remains property of the estate forever, until administered or formally abandoned by the trustee. Thus, in the case- of an omitted cause of action, the trustee is the real party in interest and the correct defense is one of ■standing, i.e., the action is not being prosecuted by the real party in interest which is the trustee, not the debtor. Cases like this must be reopened to permit the trustee to deal with the property of the estate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.