Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 F.2d 919 - Romer v. Baldwin

Romer v. Baldwin’s Empirical Analysis

317 F.2d 919 · 1963

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
January 2013
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently January 2013 · most notably Elcock v. Kmart Corp. (2000), Charles A. Castle v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., a Corporation, Chris Papastrat, Shelby Bass v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., a Corporation (1988)

28 federal appellate · 2 district ·

120196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co. · Johnson v. Stevenson · Halprin v. Mora · Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Kulp · Thompson v. Camp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'only in those cases where it is plain that the error which has crept into one element of the verdict did not in any way affect the determination of any other issue.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “significant safeguard against capricious or cavalier treatment of the issue of damages.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.