Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 F.3d 351 - Sheppard v. Beerman

Sheppard v. Beerman’s Empirical Analysis

317 F.3d 351 · 2003

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Rankin v. McPherson · Sheppard v. Beerman · Lewis v. Cowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is appropriate only if it can be established 'that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, examining the evidence in the light most favorable to, and drawing all inferences in favor of, the non-movant.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the employee's speech is reasonably likely to disrupt the effective functioning of the office, and the employee is fired to prevent this disruption.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.