Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 F.3d 503 - Davidson v. Veneman

Davidson v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis

317 F.3d 503 · 2003

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 31 U.S.C. § 3902 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 7 U.S.C. § 1421 (Agricultural Act of 1949) · 7 U.S.C. § 1445J · 7 U.S.C. § 1446

Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Russell v. National Mediation Board · Baker v. Bowen · Hanover Potato Products, Inc. v. Shalala · Herron v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is a `safety valve' designed to `insure that the Government is not deterred from advancing in good faith the novel but credible extensions and interpretations of the law that often underlie vigorous enforcement efforts.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not sufficient, in and of itself, to show that the Government's position was substantially justified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that it acted reasonably at all stages of the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.