Freeman v. Graves’s Empirical Analysis
317 F.3d 898 · 2003
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · United States v. Cronic · Bell Warden v. Cone · Mickens v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“counsel entirely fails to subject the prosecution's case to meaningful adversarial testing,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Walker v. State · Branch v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.