Weber v. Inacker’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 1975
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Seeger · Welsh II v. United States · United States v. Sisson · Witherspoon v. Illinois · United States ex rel. Brooks v. Clifford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Board unanimously believed that [Lt. Armstrong’s] alleged conscientious objector beliefs are not truly held; are not grounded in religious training and belief; and any objection to war in any form he might truly hold is based solely on [sociological experiences, philosophical views and a personal moral code].””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In summary, the Board believes that PVT Weber is an intelligent opportunist attempting to gain discharge from his voluntarily incurred military obligation under the guise of conscientious objection; and any objection to war in any form he might truly hold is based on grounds other than religious training and proven religious belief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rosengart v. Laird““The Board unanimously believed that Pvt. Weber’s alleged conscientious objector beliefs are not truly held’ * * * and any objection to war he might truly hold is based solely on a personal moral code and philosophical reasons.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.