Matos v. Devos’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Aka v. Washington Hospital Center · Baloch v. Kempthorne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an employer may reassign an individual to a lower grade position if there are no accommodation[s] that would enable the employee to remain in the current position and there are no vacant equivalent positions for which the individual is qualified with or without reasonable accommodation. Matos , 317 F.Supp.3d at 503 (citing 29 C.F.R. § App. Pt. 1630.2(o) (internal quotation marks omitted) ). To show that a proposed accommodation is reasonable, a plaintiff must prove”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there are certainly circumstances in which a 'long-delayed accommodation could be considered' unreasonable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.