Smarr v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Denno · United States v. Karo · United States v. Knotts · United States v. Benz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“inform the accused as to the charges against him so that he may present his defense and not ... be taken by surprise”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“protect the accused against another prosecution for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.