Fisher v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Hanifa v. State · McClain v. State · Huff v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While traverse jury lists must consist of a representative and fair cross-section of the community to the fullest extent possible, the same is not true of an array. Provided that persons are not systematically excluded on the basis of race or other cognizable grouping, and provided that the jurors comprising a panel are randomly selected from a representative pool, the selection process is not inherently defective. [Kent v. State, 245 Ga. App. 531 ( 538 SE2d 185 ) (2000).] The defendant has the burden of proving purposeful discrimination in the jury array. Pruitt v. State, 279 Ga. 140, 142 ( 611 SE2d 47 ) (2005).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.