Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 Ill. App. 3d 14 - Gershak v. Feign

317 Ill. App. 3d 14 - Gershak v. Feign’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2024

9 state decisions

50200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 50 U.S.C. § 3931 (Servicemembers Civil Relief Act)

Relies on 181 Ill. 2d 460 - Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. Gleason · 155 Ill. 2d 402 - In Re Estate of Hoover · 138 Ill. 2d 458 - Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church · Newcomb v. Wood · 181 Ill. 2d 112 - Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Bachmann court had to assume, faced with a sparse record, that the trial court acted within the scope of Rule 137 in imposing sanctions. The case can be read as standing for the proposition that, in an appropriate case, Rule 137 may be relied upon to impose sanctions. The appellant in Bachmann did not give us a record we could explore to test the trial court’s reasoning against an abuse of discretion standard. The trial court may have concluded that the nonappearance of the defendant in Bachmann, in violation of Rules 90(g) and 237, in itself a ground for sanctions, was exacerbated by the filing of a notice of rejection in a case where the defendant forfeited the right to rejection by failing to appear at the arbitration. It is conceivable that a notice of rejection, under certain circumstances, could be found to have been filed for an improper purpose within the meaning of Rule 137 in such a case.” Gershak, 317 Ill. App. 3d at 22 , 738 N.E.2d at 607 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.