Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 Ill. App. 3d 288 - People v. Waldrup

317 Ill. App. 3d 288 - People v. Waldrup’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Gilmore v. Taylor · 155 Ill. 2d 422 - People v. Peeples · 159 Ill. 2d 217 - People v. Childs · 155 Ill. 2d 188 - People v. Bole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court shall not impose consecutive sentences for offenses which were committed as part of a single course of conduct during which there was no substantial change in the nature of the criminal objective, unless *** the defendant was convicted of a violation of Section 12—13 [criminal sexual assault or] 12—14 [aggravated criminal sexual assault] *** of the Criminal Code of 1961, in which event the court shall enter sentences to run consecutively.” 730 ILCS 5/5—8—4(a) (West 1998).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.