Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 Md. 233 - Chew v. State

Chew v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
8
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

2 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably Gilchrist v. State (1995), 628 So. 2d 294 - Hatten v. State (1993)

2 district · 56 state decisions

40019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Swain v. State of Alabama · Griffith v. Kentucky · Ross v. Oklahoma · Bullington v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Should it appear to a trial judge presiding at a limited remand hearing that the passage of time precludes fair consideration of the relevant issues, that judge will simply order a new trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial judge held, consistent with the then existing law of Swain v. Alabama, ... that in the absence of some showing of an office policy or consistent pattern of conduct embracing more than a single case, the prosecutor was not required to give any reasons for the exercise of his peremptory challenges.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “are inherent in attempting to reconstruct events that occurred a year or more earlier, but where a reasonable possibility exists that reconstruction can be fairly accomplished, the attempt is worth the effort,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.