Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 Md. 613 - State v. Runge

State v. Runge’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

2 district · 31 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 5103 · 42 U.S.C. § 5106A

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Faretta v. California · United States v. Bagley · Berger v. United States · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is telling us that custodians have authority to release the information within the statutory framework and that if it is so released, the custodians will not be subject to prosecution under [the statute].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “provisions are made for the protection of the identity of the reporter or any other person whose life or safety is likely to be endangered by disclosing the information . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the subsection is not a mandatory discovery provision that directs disclosure of confidential social services records to child abusers or to the parents of abused children.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.