Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 Mo. 732 - Ex Parte Packman

Ex Parte Packman’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1972
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. United Railways Co. v. Public Service Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Now the power to supervise the rates, fares or charges exacted by a street railway corporation for the transportation of persons, and the regulations or practices of such corporation affecting rates, rests exclusively with the Public Service Commission. [Sec. 10456 E. S. 1919.] Consequently the provisions of the charter of St. Louis pur-porting to confer such power on it or its board of aldermen are void. [State ex rel. v. Public Service Commission, 270 Mo. 429 .] And ordi-nances in conflict with the Public Service Commission Law, whether enacted pursuant to charter provisions or not, are likewise void.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.