Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 317 N.J. Super. 103 - Voit v. Voit

317 N.J. Super. 103 - Voit v. Voit’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2014

16 state decisions

140199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beck v. Beck · Cooper v. Cooper · Holder v. Polanski · 268 N.J. Super. 387 - Todd v. Sheridan · 181 N.J. Super. 130 - Mastropole v. Mastropole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[U]nder the unique facts of the instant case, where both legal and physical custody is truly shared, the Cooper/Holder analysis, with its concomitant burden on the parent resisting the move out of state to come forward with evidence that a proposed alternative visitation schedule would be impossible or unreasonably burdensome, is inappropriate. While much of the reasoning of those cases applies, the placing of such a burden of proof on the parent resisting the move would be unfair given the totally shared-parenting arrangement that has to date been engaged successfully by the parties herein. [ Id. at 106 , 721 A. 2d 317 .]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “due to a substantial change in circumstances from the time that the current custody arrangement was established, the best interests of the child would be better served by a transfer in custody.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The realities of the situation after divorce compel the realization that the child's quality of life and style of life are provided by the custodial parent. That the interests of the child are closely interwoven with those of the custodial parent is consistent with psychological studies of children of divorced or separated parents.... Because the best interests of a child are so interwoven with the well-being of the custodial parent, the determination of the child's best interest requires that the interests of the custodial parent be taken into account.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.